|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2016 12:14:36 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by DonGirl on Nov 4, 2016 13:18:54 GMT -8
The last part had me rolling over the floor. LOL! this man can charm his way out of anything.
Also, what did she write that upset Shah Rukh?
|
|
|
|
Post by agantuk on Nov 4, 2016 18:53:16 GMT -8
Why does he still do interviews with her
|
|
|
|
Post by dilse on Nov 5, 2016 5:45:46 GMT -8
Good question!
|
|
|
|
Post by srkforever on Nov 5, 2016 6:49:45 GMT -8
i just love this look. So happy to know its straight from the set of a movie. We'll get more of it.
2 things confirm about his upcoming movies. 1. Dear Zindagi is most definitely not a lead role for him. He was clear about it. 2. He is playing a dwarf in Anand film.
I know we kinda knew both rumours but there was speculation about these not being true.
|
|
|
|
Post by palacerani on Nov 5, 2016 15:19:02 GMT -8
I can't stand Anupama Chopra. Whenever she needs a boost in her career she interviews SRK and then disses his movies. And why does she have to laugh so much? That he's witty we all know but she laughs for no reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by mpollak711 on Nov 5, 2016 18:04:41 GMT -8
Does anyone know what he meant when he said, "when you wrote what you wrote" about being upset with her. I can think of a lot of things, but what do we think he was referring to?
|
|
|
|
Post by dilse on Nov 5, 2016 20:26:21 GMT -8
Watched this for 15 minutes, can't take any more. Her fake hysterical giggling is so annoying and I feel she's doing it just to keep him talking and perhaps say something he may later regret. I totally don't trust her not to lead him into territory which will be good for her ratings but harmful for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2016 1:53:22 GMT -8
I can't stand Anupama Chopra. Whenever she needs a boost in her career she interviews SRK and then disses his movies. And why does she have to laugh so much? That he's witty we all know but she laughs for no reason. I agree her fake giggling is so annoying I would be more worried if she just gave 4-5 stars to all SRK films just because she 'owns' him that ... I mean what is she suppose to do ? His films have been bad lately excluding FAN (which she didn't diss) Anupama has been dissing movies of Salman,Akshay,Ajay equally so i don't see a reason why SRK should be spared. Why because she wrote a book about him a decade ago ? BTW her bad mounting a film doesn't have any impact of the end results, She has been trashing Salman films before Bajrangi Bhaijaan and rightly so, but it can't and won't effect Salman at all. Yes she is annoying but she was 100% on the money when it comes to reviewing SRK's films lately. |
|
|
|
Post by fatyyz on Nov 6, 2016 2:07:05 GMT -8
^ With the exception of Chennai Express which she trashed she has been on point lately
|
|
|
|
Post by neeran on Nov 10, 2016 12:02:09 GMT -8
One of his best relaxed interviews ever ( I guess the atmosphere helps!). Chopra has one irritating voice though. Maybe it is just me but SRK has changed so much than he used to be years ago. I'm not speaking professionally but the way he speaks and mannerism are quite different. Also, he seems more private and closed.
|
|
|
|
Post by neeran on Nov 10, 2016 12:06:42 GMT -8
Does anyone know what he meant when he said, "when you wrote what you wrote" about being upset with her. I can think of a lot of things, but what do we think he was referring to? If I'm not mistaken a fan told me that she was the one who wrote that SRK is finished in 2000 as HR had just entered BW, and it was a huge headline in one of the newspapers. |
|
|
|
Post by srkanatic on Nov 10, 2016 17:52:55 GMT -8
If I'm not mistaken a fan told me that she was the one who wrote that SRK is finished in 2000 as HR had just entered BW, and it was a huge headline in one of the newspapers. Yes, I think she said that in her review of Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani. |
|
poonam
Junior Member
Posts: 67 
|
Post by poonam on Nov 11, 2016 0:02:56 GMT -8
I can't stand Anupama Chopra. Whenever she needs a boost in her career she interviews SRK and then disses his movies. And why does she have to laugh so much? That he's witty we all know but she laughs for no reason. I agree her fake giggling is so annoying I would be more worried if she just gave 4-5 stars to all SRK films just because she 'owns' him that ... I mean what is she suppose to do ? His films have been bad lately excluding FAN (which she didn't diss) Anupama has been dissing movies of Salman,Akshay,Ajay equally so i don't see a reason why SRK should be spared. Why because she wrote a book about him a decade ago ? BTW her bad mounting a film doesn't have any impact of the end results, She has been trashing Salman films before Bajrangi Bhaijaan and rightly so, but it can't and won't effect Salman at all. Yes she is annoying but she was 100% on the money when it comes to reviewing SRK's films lately. I could be totally wrong on this.... I was giggling too all through the interview and I cannot help thinking that Anupama could NOT have kept a straight face, SRK was so spontaneous with his jokes! It's like when sometimes a really good joke keeps resonating within your mind and the mind won't let go of that so you keep giggling stupidly although the moment has passed...know what I mean?  As for her reviews, Anupama comes across as an educated woman and I think that is really the problem. She seems to judge Bollywood by western/art film standards and therefore, by those yardsticks, finds our movies wanting in several respects. Maybe that's the problem with most of our desi English language critics! I find Salman films mostly intolerable, but if they are such huge successes, then I wish critics like her would try to understand what makes them tick and write more nuanced reviews that would help every moviegoer decide if there's something in it for him/her or not. I've never understood this thing of reviews that audiences don't give a hoot for! I can't recall her last few SRK film reviews but if she did diss Dilwale and Happy New Year, I would find it hard to disagree. Those two were among SRK's most unfortunate choices. |
|
|
|
Post by clochette on Nov 11, 2016 2:22:18 GMT -8
Poonam, I always am happy to read you and I can relate to your last paragraph... As for Anupama...well, I think, ShahRukh just was in the mood to give her what she wanted to get...he can be marvellous at that  He was entertaining...her & the audience...and I think he also enjoyed himself...we may better understand when seeing the Lisbon part of TheRing (or whatever title Imtiaz will give to his film before release) |
|
|
|
Post by shereen on Nov 11, 2016 11:54:28 GMT -8
After long time. Such a relax interview from SRK.
|
|
|
|
Post by pagalmariam on Jan 30, 2017 10:49:25 GMT -8
Just stumbled over part 4 the other day and loved it, although the camera guy is almost as irritating as the laughing cow (not the cheese). Havn't watched the other parts yet, but most definitely will.
The tatoo was interesting - is it for a future film or did I miss something?
The best was his cross-dressing reference, and I was quite suprised that he admitted that the pole dance was probably bad. Usually he sticks to the things he is doing, and says its all part of his entertaining scheme...
I agree with neeran that his mannerisms have changed and that he has become more closed up. Although his charm has only increased if that's possible at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by mpollak711 on Jan 30, 2017 12:20:54 GMT -8
If I'm not mistaken a fan told me that she was the one who wrote that SRK is finished in 2000 as HR had just entered BW, and it was a huge headline in one of the newspapers. Yes, I think she said that in her review of Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani. I know this is a late reply, but I missed it. Thank you for clearing that up. I have been wondering. He's referred to it more than once. I hate that he gives her such great interviews which she posts and posts again to her benefit and then she pans all his films even if they are good. |
|
|
|
Post by karan on Jan 30, 2017 20:45:19 GMT -8
pagalmariam The tattoo is for Imtiaz's film - it's a Sikh symbol (the Khanda) as he plays a Sikh/Punjabi character.
|
|
|
|
Post by pagalmariam on Jan 31, 2017 8:24:00 GMT -8
pagalmariam The tattoo is for Imtiaz's film - it's a Sikh symbol (the Khanda) as he plays a Sikh/Punjabi character. Ah thank you! |
|
|
|
Post by ujjwala on Jan 31, 2017 21:57:56 GMT -8
What is this pole dancing bit?
|
|
|
|
Post by pagalmariam on Feb 1, 2017 3:32:38 GMT -8
What is this pole dancing bit? In part 4, I think second half, she is asking him why he did the pole dance number during an award function with Ranbir. He first made jokes about him being a cross-dresser (hilarious), and then went on to admit that it was a bad thing to do... of course he was charming while admitting it, but I go the feeling he seriously questioned why he did somehow like that! Just too funny! |
|
|
|
Post by ujjwala on Feb 1, 2017 5:31:10 GMT -8
In part 4, I think second half, she is asking him why he did the pole dance number during an award function with Ranbir. He first made jokes about him being a cross-dresser (hilarious), and then went on to admit that it was a bad thing to do... of course he was charming while admitting it, but I go the feeling he seriously questioned why he did somehow like that! Just too funny! No I meant when and where did he do pole dancing? I don't remember seeing anything like that. |
|
|
|
Post by pagalmariam on Feb 1, 2017 14:11:12 GMT -8
In part 4, I think second half, she is asking him why he did the pole dance number during an award function with Ranbir. He first made jokes about him being a cross-dresser (hilarious), and then went on to admit that it was a bad thing to do... of course he was charming while admitting it, but I go the feeling he seriously questioned why he did somehow like that! Just too funny! No I meant when and where did he do pole dancing? I don't remember seeing anything like that. Filmfare 2012! It's one of the things I never watched and don't have a desire to... |
|
He was entertaining...her & the audience...and I think he also enjoyed himself...we may better understand when seeing the Lisbon part of TheRing (or whatever title Imtiaz will give to his film before release) 
